.
.

Volume 3, Issue 2 (April-June, 2013)

Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita: A Clinical Image Report

Authors: Mukoro Duke George1, Fente-Koko Beleudanyo Gbaupre1, Ogugua C. Paul2, Kunle-Olowu Oyaye Efebo3download_pdf1

Affiliations: 1 Department of Surgery, Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Okolobiri, Nigeria

2 Department of Orthopedics, Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Okolobiri, Nigeria

3 Department of Pediatrics, Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Okolobiri, Nigeria

Conflict of Interest: None declared

This article has been peer reviewed.

Article Submitted on: 13th August 2012

Article Accepted on: 10th January 2013

Funding Sources: None declared

Correspondence to: Dr. Mukoro Duke George

Address: Department of Surgery, Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Okolobiri, Nigeria

Email: [email protected]

Cite this article: George MD, Gbaupre FKB, Paul OC, Efebo KOO. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: a clinical image report. J Pak Med Stud. 2013; 3(2):113-114

 

Clinical Image

JPMS-VOL3-ISSUE2-PAGES113-114-IMAGE1

 

Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AGC) is a heterogeneous group of non-progressive conditions characterized by multiple joint
contractures [1, 2] which may involve the body at birth [3, 4]. It is known to be typically symmetrical and is also known as amyoplasia [5]. It presents either in isolation or in association with other syndromes. Its etiology is considered multifactorial but poorly understood [6]. Its occurrence has shown no racial or sexual predisposition, except sporadic cases that were seen commonly in isolated populations in Finland and the Bedouin community in Israel [7]. Implicated etiological factors include chromosomal abnormalities, maternal viral infections such as enterovirus and roseola virus, and attempted termination of pregnancy, as reported by Wynne and Roberts [8]. It is usually diagnosed with muscle biopsy [9] and electromyelography. Management of AMC is multidisciplinary [9]. The images of the indexed case were used to demonstrate some clinical features of AGC as well as the atypical hipJPMS-VOL3-ISSUE2-PAGES113-114-IMAGE2 asymmetry.

A month-old female child was brought to the orthopedic clinic by her 20-year old mother, who noticed global hypertonia, hip-hip bulk discrepancy, and abduction-flexion deformity of the right hip since birth. The mother had attempted termination of pregnancy at 9 and 12 weeks of gestation by use of unknown oral and injectable medications. Patient’s mother received no antenatal care and birth was supervised by a traditional birth attendant. Infant had been immunized with oral polio vaccine and BCG vaccine, and was breastfed at the time of presentation with water supplementation.

There was a discrete, non-discharging erythematous, non-itching, papular skin rash and right upper limb showed marked hypertonia with fixed flexion deformity of the hand at the wrist (Figure 1), while left side showed marked hypertonia of the arm with fracture of the humerus (Figure 4), and no active movement at the shoulder region.JPMS-VOL3-ISSUE2-PAGES113-114-IMAGE3

The left lower limb had marked hypertonia with no active movement at the hip and knee while right lower limb had excessive range of movem ent at the hip. There was hip-hip discrepancy in muscle mass (Figure 2), abduction/flexion deformity of the right hip, plantar-flexion with inversion deformity of both feet (Figure 3) and bilateral brachydactyly. Spine was intact with marked hypertonia in opistotonic position and presence of good sucking reflex. There was absence of labia in the perineum and iris was dark brown. X-ray film showed united fracture in mid-shaft of left humerus (Figure 4), and angular deformity with apparent subluxation of adjacent elbow joint (Figure 4). Figure 5 shows hip-hip disproportion and joint asymmetry.

A diagnosis of arthrogryposis multiple congenita was made, and the mother was counseled concerning the condition of her baby. Intensive physiotherapy was commenced. Follow-up visit at 3 weeks showed adequate weight gain of 1.0 kilogram. Head circumference was noted to be 37 cm, which was adequate for age.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Bamshad M, Van Heest AE, Pleasure D. Arthrogryposis: a review and update. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 Suppl 4:40-6.JPMS-VOL3-ISSUE2-PAGES113-114-IMAGE4
  2. Taricco LD, Aoki SS. Rehabilitation of an adult patient with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita treated with an external fixator. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 88:431-4.
  3. Alfonso I, Papazian O, Paez JC, Grossman J. Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita. Int Pediatr 2000; 15:197-204.
  4. Donohue M, Bleakney DA. Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita. In: Campbell SK ed. Physical Therapy for Children. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1995:261-277.
  5. Hall JG. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: etiology, genetics, classification, diagnostic approach, and general aspects. J Pediatr Orthop B 1997; 6:159–66.
  6. Bevan WP, Hall JG, Bamshad M, Staheli LT, Jaffe KM, Song K. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (amyoplasia): an orthopaedic perspective. J Pediatr Orthop 2007; 27:594-600.
  7. Laitinen O, Hirvensalo M. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Ann Paediatr Fenn 1966; 12:133-138.
  8. Wynne-Davies R, Lloyd-Roberts GC. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: search for prenatal factors in 66 sporadic cases. Arch Dis Child 1976; 51:618-623.
  9. Thompson GH, Bilenker RM. Comprehensive management of arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (194):6-14.

 

JPMS-VOL3-ISSUE2-PAGES113-114-IMAGE5